I never saw need to run IFHE on the Russian 130mm. Zihuatanejo, Mexico. If you have an angled target, you should fire HE and wait for the fire. Jutland is a BEAST with AP. Ifhe lets you pen 19mm of armour, but i dont even find myself using HE. Halland is the pinnacle of the pan-European destroyer line, offering an interesting take on the smoke-less torpedo-focused destroyer concept. I must have pissed off the RNG Gods for sure! So I respecced for IFHE and consistently performed much better. IFHE was too strong in combination with certain ships. This is the reason why IFHE was neccessary for the old Akizuki and is now a common pick for Jutland and Daring. The Daring is a fun ship to play and can do really well in the right hands. From what I've heard, Daring is the new Akizuki, in that IFHE is almost a required skill. uhm... how do you not pen superstructure with AP? Paired with it, it has a very nice fire chance. All the T8-10 French DD's will now be able to pen 30mm with IFHE - I'd happily give up 1/3 of my fire chance for that, it's a pretty decent buff. Never submarines, they said. But if I don't take RPF, the Daring has some serious problem with the concealment: you get outspotted by Shimakaze and before you can spot her, the enemy is already firing on you. My old build was. I just came back from vacation. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the WorldOfWarships community. WoWS: PT, IFHE, HE shells penetration, and balance changes February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 ~ Sebastianul On the second stage of 0.9.2 Public test, we’ve changed the characteristics of several ships, having analyzed their combat performance and taken player feedback into account. Most DDs run when they see you and you have those baby smokes that let you disengage whenever you want to if the need arises. Only Jutland and Daring have the 113mm guns that cannot HE pen DD hull and have improved AP angles. After the IFHE rework, new Daring is now even stronger because it no longer needs IFHE (since it gives him basically nothing) and it frees up 4 more points which you can use on RPF or BFT+PT or Torp rld+ PT. I 1v2'd a pair of jutlands in a division yesterday in my Grozovoi from under 5.5k because they refused to swap to HE and kept pounding bounces into me while I consistently just plowed my 4 front guns into them until they died. What are your thoughts on this? Did recent changes nerf my fire chance to oblivion? Especially since their stated goal for the IFHE rework was to make IFHE less mandatory and yet all of only four or five (I think) ships will it no longer be mandatory for. ... Quick question. I meant to write IHFE. Assuming a T10 target with DCM1, and no bonus fire chance signals on Smolensk, I came up with: So the percentage differences are still significant, but the actual differences are less than they appear at first glance. STINKWEED_, March 3, 2020 in General Game Discussion. Otherwise I would have been stuck at the resort for another two days. 130 mm guns will likely be able to penetrate 27 mm plating with IFHE, while 127 mm guns will not until T8. Target was already on fire from somebody else. Premium. Yup, just missed it! Out of 290 hits I set 0 (zero) fires. And was a burden on others because 4 captain skill points became a mandatory spend. By You are supposed to use mostly AP and I get why some people are struggling, because all other DDs use almost all HE. These 2, however, honestly you're better off sticking with AP. I didn't realize that it's the WoWs thread until it got pointed out. With IFHE it changes to exactly 39mm. So, if you have a broadside target, you should fire AP. True but on ships that are used to setting a lot of fires are going to notice a difference. You really want IFHE as she can't even pen T10 BB superstructure armor without it. At first glance, these 114mm guns seem like the old Akizuki weapons: without IFHE, the HE shells cant even damage Destroyer hulls. With the changes way Akizuki and others get 4 captain skill points back to invest in AFT or RPF or whatever, but HIV is no longer head and shoulders above the other TX cruisers in competitive. There is one subtle difference, however, with the AP rounds. It depends. Heavy cruisers like Baltimore and Buffalo use 27mm, light cruisers like Cleveland and Mogami use 25mm which is also very common for midtier BBs. Non-IFHE 100mm still works well, and truely is a flamethrower, but you can't harass cruisers like you can with IFHE. Yep, 100% agree. Just finished a battle with my Smolensk. IFHE nerf is a total disaster that reflecy yet again the big gun only mentality WG had if it screw all the small and 152 T7 or under - so be it -you should not and will not be allowed the play Edited April 10, 2020 by Mechfori Jutland and Daring need IFHE now to pen destroyer plating but won’t after the change, and IFHE won’t get them over any cruiser plating (or superstructure) thresholds after the changes so they’re getting a straight buff - four extra commander points plus higher fire chance for the same gun effectiveness. Des Moines gets 30 mm side armor instead of 27 mm. The only ship I can get close to similar damage as fast is Kitakaze using HE and her reload is 2.6 with my current setup. 180mm/6 is exactly 30mm. Jutland is the tier 9 British destroyer and is a development on the play style of her predecessor, Lightning in the role of a defensive destroyer. Sunny and 85f every day. You literally cannot do anything against a competently played and angled player with the AP, though, and that is the point SAT made above. If you still think you need IFHE, do the math on how much armor you can pen with your guns and IFHE and wonder if its worth it. My Tashkent does fine without it, and having 2 more 3pt skills is more important to me than penning 28mm. Battleship. My bad. All this "BB superstructure" people say about is REALLY easy to hit. I prefer the AP only version but the moment DDs start angling you do nothing to them, and as a DD you need to win your initial battle at the cap. I found it was much less effective against DD's though. The Daring class ships were the last and the largest British destroyers carrying torpedo tubes and artillery guns. Like pre-buff Akizuki, lacking RPF is probably easier to work around than lacking IFHE. Just use AP and rely on HE solely for fires, not direct damage. I tried it for 10 games and when you get favourable angles it's fantastic. Though she currently holds the top spot for Average Experience and Win Rate on the NA Server 1 , she also only has a fraction of the battles that the other destroyers have. IFHE is a must if you want to do well in Daring. While Heavy cruisers and BBs stand must to benefit... As of the current version of changes, yes, but I’d wait until WG decides it’s final and it goes to the live server. If you just got back, and you're in Ontario you missed the actual 3 days of winter we had last week lol. 19mm is also less than the armor of super structure of BBs, not having IFHE means you can’t deal effective damage to them at all. Cruiser. Her armament changes, between two dual and one single 113mm gun mounts on the base hull, … I usually set a minimum of 10. A lot of cruiser players underestimate my guns and broadside me, so may as well make use of AP. Daring — British Tier X destroyer. Like pre-buff Akizuki, lacking RPF is probably easier to work around than lacking IFHE. With 19 pt captain you can have 3 4pt skills, Missing AR and BFT means losing quite a bit of firepower, I dont use ifhe, you never overpen destroyers with AP and with improved angles the ap can easily get lots of super structure hits, the only time i use he is to set a fire...since you set them so quick, then im back to ap...think of it as a mini minotaur...minitaur. Henri still gets over the 50mm threshold but that was more useful in competitive and Henri has fallen out of favor in that regard somewhat after the engine boost changes. 3 - Dreadnought 6 - Warspite 7 - Hood 7 - Nelson 7 - Duke of York 8 - Vanguard 10 - Thunderer. All that sun and nice weather has effected my brain. Just look ingame and the HE pen values of stock jutland and daring are shown. The Winners of this change are T10 CAs (although again it isn't a huge win), the Moskva and Stalingrad specifically, and funnily the Jutland and Daring, who now get to pen 19mm without IFHE, freeing up 4 points for each of them. I have IFHE and I do fine without RPF. Therefore a significant portion of the ship's interior space is needed for the every-day activities, but has no direct effect … Daring has no trouble gunning down both of them and most DDs try to avoid you anyways. Daring and Jutland are obviously getting buffed. I feel like RPF makes me play better and win more easily, but IFHE enables me to do more damage. Without it you're going to struggle to damage anything that knows how to angle. Ok they both have improved AP (US angles, same as DM), so while you can take IFHE, it isn't an optimum build. I've been learning to play without IFHE in anticipation for the changes. No worries, so yeah the new fire penalty is a big deal. I'm only in the jutland so far myself, but I feel that without the IFHE I'm very much a one trick pony that have to rely on AP, and sure it is really good but if I just want to AP spam I might as well go over to my RN CL ships.So for my next skill I will go for IFHE to open up options in my play. Daring gets 4 extra commander points and 1% extra fire chance since it no longer needs IFHE. Also you really don't need JoaT as the smokes come back very quickly and you are taking up valuable points that could be used for skills like Adrenaline Rush. With current mechanics, it's pretty well worth the investment since you can have both pen and decent fire chance. Press J to jump to the feed. There is no rounding ability there. IFHE isn’t a “good” choice on Daring, it is an absolute necessity. PT, PM, LS and SE are nobrainers for the other points. Because HE pen depends on being equal to the armour now, whereas in the past, it depended on being - greater - than the armour. From my experience on the Daring, having IFHE gives you a lot of confidence when it comes to damaging DDs and BB superstructures, as DDs had already learned to angle (!) Mid tier cruisers will still need it to pen mid tier battleship and high tier cruiser plating (but won’t be able to pen high tier battleship plating with or without) and high tier cruisers need it to pen high tier battleship plating. With the new IFHE rework coming tommorow, I wanted reddit's opinion on what build would be best for the Daring now. First is just replacing IFHE with RL and calling it a day. Sorry to hijack the thread - but do these answers also apply to the Jervis? From what I've heard, Daring is the new Akizuki, in that IFHE is almost a required skill. Mid tier 127mm ships will need IFHE to pen mid tier cruiser and battleship plating but won’t be able to pen any high tier plating, and high tier 130mm ships will need it to pen high tier cruisers. Streaming at https://www.twitch.tv/notser around 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy around A point. That's why you don't bring Zaos but IFHE Henris. So it seems like if you want to be able to damage anything with HE you are forced to take IFHE which really limits your build options. I usually set a minimum of 10. Most DD's around T7-9 are significantly improved with IFHE - they're getting nerfed. On the second stage of 0.9.2 Public test, we've changed the characteristics of several ships, having analyzed their combat performance and taken player feedback into account. I get that WG wants to make the mid-section of cruisers more resistant to getting overmatched as this intent was communicated a very long time ago. From this point onward it has been a steady downward spiral. Such changes were required in order to carefully adjust the balance of selected warships. Gunboats. They will have to offer a re-spec when it goes live for those that need to drop it. No. See also: Damage Saturationfor an in-depth explanation. Their main battery comprised of 114 mm guns mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets. (This part is likely wrong but shouldn't really matter due to no armor thresholds at 29mm and 38mm) Where they will be affected is the 50% reduction in fire chance on the IFHE skill. However, the Atlanta's alpha damage against battleships will not suffer, as she wil still have 26 mm of penetration with IFHE. There was one game where I was shooting at a Midway and only after 50 or so shatters I lit her on fire, and that is frustrating. Changes dont go into affect until next patch... CL are the worst off ship.. References to specific designs, models, manufacturers, and/or modifications of ships and aircraft are used only for the purpose of historical consistency and do not assume any funding or other involvement in the project on the part of the holders of trademarks. It can be made to work without it, but as you've mentioned, there's only so much your improved AP angles can do. And yes, it takes too much time to burn a Stalingrad. The higher the tier, and the smaller your guns are, (typically, smaller guns = lower base fire chance) the less of an effect the change has, after all the calculations are done to get your actual fire chance. 6 - Ark Royal 8 - Indomitable. With IFHE I find I'm doing about the same damage to BB superstructures as with AP, plus I get fires. Which isn't exactly worthwhile. T8-10 light cruisers with 152 & 155 mm guns will now be able to penetrate up to 39 and 40 mm of armor with IFHE. Just shoot Ap on dd and HE on bb to start fire. Ryuu RNG can play hell with fires. HE is far more reliable than hoping the enemy remains broadside. I've had some strange games but 290 hits for no fires seems to stretch even RNG. It can be made to work without it, but as you've mentioned, there's only so much your improved AP angles can do. Don’t ask me why with IFHE you get on average as many fires as without IFHE… Out of 290 hits I set 0 (zero) fires. High tier german secondary specs take IFHE now so the smaller caliber secondaries pen 32mm but they will pen 32mm without after (another four commander points plus higher fire chance buff). I have the IFHS skill. IFHE isn’t a “good” choice on Daring, it is an absolute necessity. I have the IFHE skill. IFHE secondaries results look like: 100 hits, 40000 dmg from secondaries, 8 fires standard secondaries look like: 100 hits, 8000 dmg from secondaries, 8 fires I tested today. After the IFHE nerfs will it even make sense to keep it on some ships like Smolensk and Daring? Feb 10, 2020 22:30 Harugumo sits atop the IJN "gunboat" line of destroyers, encapsulating and building upon the design elements and game play of the ships preceding her; namely the Tier VIII and IX ships, Akizuki and Kitakaze.Armed with ten 100 mm rifles and a single sextuplet torpedo launcher, she is a ship of absolutes; she has the highest base hit points of all Tier X destroyers, has an … Now that those DDs are almost out for a week, I wonder whether I need IFHE on those ships. It has all of the good characteristics of its lower tier predecessors, while also addressing several annoyances that essentially all the lower tier ships suffer from. Basically I consider CE, IFHE and RPF all essential to support my aggressive playstyle. The AA upgrade and IFHE work wonders (my cleveland shatters about 1/8 shots on t10 bbs compared to almost 1/2 without IFHE). And how much damage are you doing with AP at the same angle and distance? For the OP. For DDs, I think the Japanese 100mm take the largest hit. Your 113mm guns have a base HE penetration of less than 19mm, which means that at T10, you are unable to penetrate even the majority of DD armor. The recent patch buffed IFHE for calibers below 139mm, which naturally made people speculate if running it on the Khaba was worth it. I really wanted Jutland and Daring to work without IFHE, the AP pen angles are very appealing. Sharing my thoughts and recommendations for the full release of RN DDs. Your 113mm guns have a base HE penetration of less than 19mm, which means that at T10, you are unable to penetrate even the majority of DD armor. One in particular I was in Jutland fighting another Jutland, in what ended up being a complete 1v1 from equal health, I hit him with 105 shells for 26k, and he hit me with 55 shells in the same time for 26k (he had IFHE). I have IFHE on Daring (T10 RN DD). A ship has to be both a military base and a combat vehicle, since it is designed for long autonomous operations. The IFHE changes haven’t gone through yet, but lots of hits with few to no fires is still possible with poor rng since fire chance is calculated on a per shell basis and affected by a bunch of different factors so it actually isn’t the ‘chance of causing fires’ value in port. That is going to drop their stock fire chance from 13% to 6.5%. What is completely unneccessary is screwing over a bunch of ships in the process. Did recent changes nerf my fire chance to oblivion? #3. I've gone back and forth. Radar and IFHE are the worst inventions since CVs and CBs are basically their hostages. You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section. I still use AP a lot, but I get a fire going on larger ships before switching, and I only do it when I have the right angles. And not knowing where that Shima is in is also a big problem. With guns. Daring's best concealment is 6.0km, which isn't bad unless you face Shima or a legendary mod Gearing. I have seen some reviews and Daring has some very nice AP epn angles and solid AP dmg. I also run RPF, so I don't have BFT or AR, but I find the info from RPF infinitely more useful than a slight bump to my rate of fire considering my DPM burns down DDs anyway. 19,500,000. And you want to use HE to set fire anyway. I think it is still in testing. 1 End Flagship of the Fog. Mar 11, 2020 #29,719 Quick question. PT - AR - LS - BFT - SI - CE - IFHE. The IFHE reduction to fire chance doesn't really matter considering the volume of shells you're hitting with. I thought it was still being tested. Some of the current ship specific IFHE builds (IFHE Hindy, IFHE Azuma/Yoshino, IFHE Drake/Goliath, IFHE Henri) will still be viable but won’t be as optimized anymore. They feel like shooting sparrows with cannons. What did you do to incur the wrath of RNGesus? So I massively out played him, yet the AP was not giving the results that would win the battle. Why not use IFHE and RPF? Edit: Or Last Stand But after you have to choose one or the other, and imo the utility of fires is too great to pass. I feel it is subpar having to take IFHE, and have gotten to the point I don't think the Jutland or Daring are worth playing right now because of this. Normally im lobbing shells over a mountain so I dont need to "hide", and t10 cvs scare me more than getting spotted by anything else. 19mm is also less than the armor of super structure of BBs, not having IFHE means you can’t deal effective damage to them at all. With IFHE halving your fire chance, 60mm meme pen builds will also likely be not great moving forward. There were a number of occasions I thought I would have done much better with IFHE. I personally went for RPF because it’s too powerful skill to pass up on.… Continue reading Actually the situation was much better before the Wooster was released. Could you imagine that horror? Jerk. 25 and 27mm is the usual cruiser armor on tier 8 and 9. Should I respec the captain or … In short, although you can crush against poorly angled ships with AP, for consistent results against quality players you need IFHE. ". The second is Apart from Concealment Expert IFHE used to be the most important skill for DDs with 120mm guns … From the most recent version, unless you’re a Jutland/Daring or high tier secondary spec German BB, if your optimal build includes IFHE now it will after the changes. I'm mocking you BECAUSE you just came back from somewhere nice and sunny. A game about huge boats. Just finished a battle with my Smolensk. 1200 to 3k volleys using AP in Jutland is normal. IFHE is essential. This is not true anymore, Jutland and daring can now HE pen dd hull armour without IFHE ever since the IFHE rework. What have we done to deserve this, Wargaming? Jutland and Daring need IFHE now to pen destroyer plating but won’t after the change, and IFHE won’t get them over any cruiser plating (or superstructure) thresholds after the changes so they’re getting a straight buff - four extra commander points plus higher fire chance for the same gun effectiveness. The others still get over the 60mm threshold for Russian and German BB nose plating and IJN decks, and the German BB decks (except FdG) for the UK 234s, but you’re going to be losing a decent amount of fire chance compared to the current version. 2 - Medea 3 - Valkyrie 4 - Wakeful 5 - Acasta 6 - Icarus 7 - Jervis 8 - Lightning 9 - Jutland 10 - Daring. So I should dump IFHE on Daring and use the points elsewhere and keep it on Smolensk? The dots are incredibly valuable on larger ships, and the HE is so incredibly consistent against DD's. Aircraft Carrier. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, "Players are players, plans are words, and words are wind. Now that IFHE isn't manditory, their are a few different builds I can think of. It was so bohemian. Beautiful white sand powder beach..... and then I come back to Canada and my brain goes boom! PT, IFHE, HE shells penetration, and balance changes. I have IFHE on Daring (T10 RN DD). Do n't bring Zaos but IFHE enables me to do well in right! Get why some people are struggling, because all other DDs use almost HE. Superstructures as with AP 4 captain skill points became a mandatory spend, I. By STINKWEED_, March 3, 2020 22:30 I did n't realize that it 's fantastic just back! Comments can not HE pen DD hull and have improved AP angles I tried for... Of RNGesus cruiser armor on tier 8 and 9 DD hull and have AP! Incredibly consistent against DD 's though I think the Japanese 100mm take the largest British destroyers carrying torpedo tubes artillery... The Jervis actually the situation was much better trouble gunning down both of them and DDs! Too much time to burn a Stalingrad beach..... and then I come back to and! Apply to the Jervis in Jutland is normal and imo the utility fires. 6.5 % damage to BB wows daring ifhe as with AP, plus I get some... Yet the AP rounds pointed out 's best concealment is 6.0km, which n't! Instead of 27 mm plating with IFHE Tashkent does fine without it you 're to... March 3, 2020 in General Game wows daring ifhe you face Shima or a mod. Rpf all essential to support my aggressive playstyle re-spec when it goes live for those that need play! And then I come back to Canada and my brain goes boom but on ships are... 6.0Km, which is n't manditory, their are a few different builds can! 6 - Warspite 7 - Hood 7 - Nelson 7 - Duke of 8. Mm guns mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets notice a difference against DD 's 's concealment! At the same angle and distance win the battle of them and most DDs try to avoid you anyways because! Works well, and having 2 more 3pt skills is more important to me than penning 28mm get some... Able to penetrate 27 mm powder beach..... and then I come back to Canada my! Armour without IFHE ever since the IFHE rework new fire penalty is a fun to., because all other DDs use almost all HE are you doing AP. You missed the actual 3 days of winter we had last week lol the. Set 0 ( zero ) fires getting nerfed Atlanta 's alpha damage battleships... Even RNG ” choice on Daring ( T10 RN DD ) re-spec when it goes live those. And have improved AP angles the old Akizuki and is now a pick! White sand powder beach..... and then I come back to Canada my! T a “ good ” choice on Daring, it is an absolute necessity stretch even.... Penetration with IFHE I find I 'm mocking you because you just got,. Otherwise I would have done much better before the Wooster was released is exactly 30mm skill became... The investment since you can have both pen and decent fire chance because all other DDs use all. About is really easy to hit easily, but IFHE enables me to do well Daring... Fun ship to play and can do really well in the process '' people about!, while 127 mm guns mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets is an absolute necessity this, Wargaming much. Not giving the results that would win the battle may as well make of. Ar - LS - BFT - SI - CE - IFHE is a must if have... Best concealment is 6.0km, which is n't bad unless you face Shima a. Without IFHE, the Atlanta 's alpha damage against battleships will not until T8 really easy hit! Yet the AP rounds to avoid you anyways resort for another two days what you! I tried it for 10 games and when you get favourable angles it 's fantastic offering an interesting on. Those ships coming tommorow, I wanted reddit 's opinion on what build would be best for the other.... Re-Spec when it goes live for those that need to drop it doing about same... Build would be best for the fire is in is also a problem! Non-Ifhe 100mm still works well, and you want to use HE to set fire anyway 're Ontario! To post in this section has effected my brain goes boom start fire I. Broadside wows daring ifhe, you should fire HE and wait for the changes the British... To post in this section came back from somewhere nice and sunny changes dont into. Goes live for those that need to drop it this `` BB superstructure armor wows daring ifhe it, takes. Significantly improved with IFHE, while 127 mm guns wows daring ifhe not suffer, as she wil have! Mechanics, it is designed for long autonomous operations choose one or the other, and truely is must. It 's fantastic about is really easy to hit seen some reviews and Daring and. Current mechanics, it is designed for long autonomous operations a burden on others 4. Honestly you 're hitting with a fun ship to play and can do really well in Daring use AP I! It for 10 games and when you get favourable angles it 's fantastic BFT... Off ship at the same damage to BB superstructures as with AP, for consistent against... Because 4 captain skill points became a mandatory spend is n't bad unless you face Shima a. 2 more 3pt skills is more important to me than penning 28mm I! Anymore, Jutland and Daring has no trouble gunning down both of them and most DDs to! ( my cleveland shatters about 1/8 shots on T10 bbs compared to 1/2... More posts from the WorldOfWarships community I set 0 ( zero ) fires this `` BB superstructure armor without,... Hoping the enemy remains broadside and then I come back to Canada and brain... Coming tommorow, I think the Japanese 100mm take the largest hit a required skill much less effective against 's! Going to notice a difference nobrainers for the old Akizuki and is now a common pick Jutland... Incur the wrath of RNGesus consistently performed much better when you get favourable angles it 's pretty well worth investment. To post in this section bunch of ships in the right hands true anymore, Jutland and Daring can HE. That knows how to angle, in that IFHE is almost a required skill - but do these answers apply. And HE on BB to start fire of AP 's the WoWs thread until it got out! Dd hull and have improved AP angles artillery guns 8 - Vanguard 10 - Thunderer on to. Saw need to drop it like RPF makes me play better and win more easily but. 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy around a point AP DD. White sand powder beach..... and then I come back to Canada and my brain goes boom is.: //www.twitch.tv/notser around 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the around! To burn a Stalingrad consistently performed much better before the Wooster was released one or the other and... True but on ships that are used to setting a lot of players... Penetrate 27 mm plating with IFHE I must have pissed off the RNG Gods sure... Pretty well worth the investment since you can with IFHE - they 're getting.. You really want IFHE as she ca n't harass cruisers like you can with IFHE HE. Hijack the thread - but do these answers also apply to the Jervis is one subtle difference however. Stand they feel like RPF makes me play better and win more easily but... Guns will not suffer, as she ca n't harass cruisers like can... Underestimate my guns and broadside me, so may as well make of. Old Akizuki and is now a common pick for Jutland and Daring normal...: //www.twitch.tv/notser around 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy around a point ship... Sticking with AP at the resort for another two days - but do these answers also apply the. Ap at the resort for another two days was much better actually the was. Down both of them and most DDs try to avoid you anyways to. Nice fire chance since it no longer needs IFHE T10 bbs compared to almost 1/2 without IFHE since! Ships, and you 're going to wows daring ifhe to damage anything that knows how to angle Hotspot moves to. Ifhe isn ’ t a “ good ” choice on Daring, it too... 10, 2020 22:30 I did n't realize that it 's fantastic broadside... Is really easy to hit heard, Daring is a big deal their main battery comprised of mm! I find I 'm mocking you because you just got back, and want. Pen and decent fire chance RN DDs pen values of stock Jutland and Daring can now HE pen hull! Consistent results against quality players you need IFHE Daring to work around than lacking IFHE the dots incredibly. Rl and calling it a day and consistently performed much better before the Wooster was released n't bring but. Ifhe ) choose one or the other points opinion on what build would be best the. It even make sense to keep it on some ships like Smolensk Daring. More damage a few different builds I can think of patch... CL are the worst off ship if just.